Enjoy this excerpt from one of our published books.
To officiate a game effectively, we have to remain alert, be decisive and have a pre-planned practiced response to conflict in mind. Have you ever seen an official that doesn’t seem to be concentrating during a game? S/he may be checking a cell phone (I’ve seen that too many times). Or they’re talking to a fan during play or during a break in the action. The hands in the pockets and the arms folded across their chest are also some signs of boredom, fatigue and being disinterested. You might say, “I do that but that doesn’t mean I’m not ready to
officiate.” That’s debatable. That type of body language gives the players, coaches and fans an impression that you’re not ready, you’re disinterested and lazy. There is always someone watching what you do. By giving an impression that you are ready, you are engaged and you care, you positively impact your ability to communicate effectively. To better understand the concept of “awareness” during a game, we utilize a color code that assigns a color to each level:
As an official you should be in condition yellow, ready to make the call so you can move up to orange. Level orange means you are in position to make the call. You then move up to red, which is where you make the decisive call and/or decision. If you end up in condition black you are in trouble. This is when the conflict occurs and is not handled properly. This happens when you are not paying attention to what is happening during the game (everywhere around you).
In 2014, I had the privilege of teaching this program at the referee academy hosted by the Washington Soccer Referee’s Committee. I attended the breakout sessions, one of which was taught by Major League Soccer Official Bill Dittmar. Bill ran a drill in which he staged a 3 on 3 soccer game in a confined (much smaller field) area. No running was allowed and all of the players had to constantly communicate with each other just like they would in a game. There was a lot of talking going on. The area was surrounded by the other trainees in groups of two. One official in each group was told to face the field with their eyes closed and try to describe to their partner what was happening on the field — things like which team had the ball, were they attacking or defending, was there a foul, a goal, etc.? He called this the “Sounds of the Game.” The purpose of the drill was to pay attention to what is being said and done on the field, giving you a better feel for the game. In other words, listen not just with your ears but also with all of your senses. I was impressed. This is a concept that I had been teaching to umpires for several years. By listening to what the teams are saying, how they are relating to each other and what the coaches are saying to the players and officials, you can prepare yourself for any type of conflict that will occur. This helps you predict that there will be conflict, prepare you to handle the conflict and justify your response to the conflict.
Proxemics 10-5-2
Let’s take a look at a low frequency but high-risk area of officiating. How and why are sports officials
Here’s a scenario: In a soccer game, a player receives a yellow card for a reckless tackle. The player has a reputation for aggression toward officials and other players and has demonstrated this during the game. The soccer official sees another serious foul committed by this player and then runs toward the player holding up a red card. The official moves into the 2-foot zone and gets punched in the face after presenting the card. This kind of bad tactic by officials can and has happened in other sports. Don’t move into that danger zone unless you are sure it’s safe and only move in if you feel it’s absolutely necessary.
There are times when communications will take place inside that 2-foot zone. There are also times when distance is determined by the other person who moves into your zone. What do you do then? When you make an assessment that someone is upset and may make physical contact with you, you should have your hands up to protect yourself. The best tactic is to have your hands above your waist (generally chest level) with open palms. The key here is to appear as non-aggressive as possible without sacrificing your ability to protect yourself. You can practice this tactic by having someone move quickly toward you (arguing a call). You simply place your hands out in front of you and say “Stop, what’s the issue?” You can also add in the “time out” sign.
Each sport has its own conflicts that can repeat from game to game. In baseball, it may be arguing balls and strikes, in soccer it may be offside calls, in basketball it may be traveling, in football it may be holding calls. Whatever sport, you hear similar things being said from coaches and players. So why do we have officials saying and doing unprofessional things in response to what is being said to them? It’s because they over-react to what is said. The rule to remember in these situations is to “stop reacting and start responding” instead.
If we can predict what will happen after a close call at first base or a holding call on a “big” play, then we should have a planned response. If we know that players, coaches and fans have been upset with us during the game, then we should plan our exit from the event. Your plan has to be thought out and practiced to be effective. As “Coach” Bob Lindsey says, instead of practicing “if then” thinking, you should practice “when then” thinking. “If then” thinking portrays a mindset that says “if this happen I will do plan A, B or C.” This puts you into a state of denial (“if ”) that any conflicts will occur during the event. If you practice “when then” thinking, you are simply saying that certain calls you make will provoke certain reactions. When that happens, be ready to respond with plan(s) A, B, C or even D. You will be utilizing a preplanned practiced response.